Introduction

Estonian living environment in 2050

Key messages

  • Future changes will affect the physical space – both the natural and built environment – and redistribute it based on new uses.

Changes in the living environment are related to changes in the world and our ability to adapt to them. Factors influencing the development of our living environment include climate change, international corporations and politics, new technologies and services, as well as the ageing population and urbanisation. In reshaping our living environment, we must bear in mind that we cannot reverse what is already done as this would take decades, be costly and complicated. Therefore, choices affecting the living environment must rest on an understanding of the long-term impact on the quality of the living environment.

  • Estonia faces a spatial choice: either to continue developing a liberal living environment with amenities only for those who are financially unburdened or to develop a more inclusive living environment that focuses on improving well-being for all.

To aid in this choice, four scenarios are presented in this chapter that illustrate the changes taking place in the world and in Estonia, along with their consequences. The scenarios are narratives that help us envision the future and provide a common basis for discussing it. With the help of these scenarios, we invite the reader to think about the kind of living environment we wish to inhabit in the future, and the kinds of futures we want to avoid.

The previous chapters of this report have described changes that have occurred over the past 30 years in the ways we communicate, travel and live, in our location preferences and our relationship to the natural environment. What will our living environment look like over the next 30 years? This chapter aims to outline the potential futures of the Estonian living environment based on global, regional and local trends and policy choices, and to use these factors to draft four future scenarios. The scenarios themselves are tools for thinking that illustrate the changes taking place in Estonia and the world, along with their consequences.

A thought exercise: current topics 30 years ago (1987–1988)

  • Phosphorite rises on the agenda, specifically the plan to open a large-scale phosphorite mine in the Rakvere district, which would pollute the environment.
  • The Estonian Green Movement is founded in the course of two green forums in Tallinn on 28 April and 23 May 1988.
  • The Estonian Heritage Society is founded in Tallinn on 12 December 1987, with Trivimi Velliste as chairman.
  • On 6 December 1987, the 500,000th citizen of Tallinn is born.
  • The first computer virus appears and there is initial discussion of the concept of the World Wide Web.

With the help of these scenarios, we invite the reader to think about the kind of world we wish to inhabit in the future, and the kinds of future we want to avoid. How are we able to adapt to global developments as well as future challenges inside Estonia? The chapter consists of three parts. First, we provide an overview of the method and main principles of scenario planning. Then, we describe the main trends affecting the Estonian living environment. At the end of the chapter, we outline four future scenarios for the Estonian living environment.

What is scenario planning?

Scenario planning is a planning method that aims to understand the impact of current changes and decisions on shaping the future. A scenario is a tool for strategic thinking that is used in situations where preparing for the future and making decisions is necessary despite uncertainty. The scenarios outlined here are based on the method of intuitive logics, which uses existing predictions and data to create narratives about the future that illustrate the consequences of various developments (Wright et al. 2013).

The living environment is a distinctive field in scenario planning, because unlike technologies and services, it is slow to change. Rapid changes in the living environment involve large investments, which require money and political agreements. The living environment may be carefully planned, but the time it takes to implement these plans is generally long and real changes are slow to appear.

Factors influencing the development of the 21st-century living environment are climate change, international corporations and politics, new technologies and services, as well as the ageing population and urbanisation.

It is difficult to predict the role and impact that factors influencing the living environment have in shaping the future. Quantitative methods are used for measuring changes in various sectors, which do not provide an overview of how the living environment is changing as a whole. Changes in the living environment are related to changes in the world and our ability to adapt. Factors influencing the development of the 21st-century living environment are climate change, international corporations and politics, new technologies and services, as well as the ageing population and urbanisation. It is often difficult to grasp which of these carry the most weight or lead to unexpected and surprising consequences. For this reason, factors shaping the future are described on two levels – as forecasts and as weak signals. Various sectoral forecasts (e.g. population forecasts) are prepared by extending past and present trends into the future. Such predictions give us an idea of the potential future if the current situation continues, but ignore factors that may shift trends and the unexpected combined impact of sectoral trends in shaping the future (Thomas 1994).

For this reason, the concept of weak signals has been adopted in future studies, which means that in addition to forecasts, smaller changes that have the potential to shift future trajectories are also considered. Weak signals can be seen, for example, in the values of the younger generation: young people, with their current preferences in consumption and mobility, set the patterns of behaviour for the future. Although their wider impact cannot yet be demonstrated, weak signals are important indicators to examine, as they help discuss future changes, the actual impact of which may only become apparent decades later. In this chapter, we use both types of factor – forecasts, which are more likely to prove true, and weak signals, which may have a significant impact on the living environment, but cannot currently be backed with existing evidence.

The scenarios were prepared in three stages: aggregating sectoral changes, identifying the most likely or influential changes, and using future scenarios to illustrate the consequences of these changes. Sectoral changes were determined using forecasts, reports and scenarios from Estonia and elsewhere. Some global scenarios and forecasts were included, but most of the developments described in the chapter are based on the European context and values. As a second starting point, we used the changes discussed in the chapters of this report concerning the functioning and use of the deliberative space, the living environment and the natural environment over the past 30 years, along with potential future perspectives for these fields proposed by the authors of the articles. In order to identify the most likely and significant factors, workshops with chapter editors and sectoral experts were held. In these workshops, we selected two key directions for the future narratives and produced initial content for each scenario, focusing on the daily life of residents and their relations with one another. Following the workshops, we refined the descriptions of the changes with the greatest impact and wrote up future narratives to illustrate the scenarios. Two spatial levels were considered in the selection of the described future changes: first, a larger spatial scale on which changes affect the location of living environments and their interconnections throughout Estonia, and second, a smaller spatial scale that covers changes within the living environments. In identifying significant changes, we excluded extreme shifts such as the collapse of the European Union or natural disasters. We also expected Estonia to have retained its independence in 2050. Based on these inputs, we compiled the main trends that will have significant impact on (re)shaping the spatial living environment over the next 30 years.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank everyone who participated in the future scenario workshops. Thank you, Helen Sooväli-Sepping, Indrek Ibrus, Asko Lõhmus, Kadri Leetmaa, Epp Lankots, Triin Vihalemm, Margit Keller, Kaja Peterson, Alar Kilp, Teele Pehk, Gerrit Mäesalu, Anni Müüripeal, Martin Noorkõiv, Mihkel Laan, Mihkel Kaevats, Toomas Tammis, Jan Kaus and Kaisa Schmidt-Thomé!

Forecasts and scenarios used

Foresight Centre – Arenguseire Keskus 2018. Tööturg 2035. Tööturu tulevikusuunad ja -stsenaariumid.

Foresight Centre – Arenguseire Keskus 2019. Eesti regionaalse majanduse stsenaariumid 2035.

Demos Helsinki 2018. Kaupungistumisen käännekohdat: skenaarioita Suomen kaupungistumisen tulevaisuudesta 2039.

Demos Helsinki 2019. The Zone of Open Optimism: A Scenario of the Tallinn–Helsinki Metropolitan Area in the 2030s.

EHFG – European Health Forum Gastein 2017. The EHFG Health Futures Project: Scenarios for Health in 2037.

Luhamaa, A., Kallis, A., Mändla, K., Männik, A., Pedusaar, T., Rosin, K. 2014. Eesti tuleviku kliimastsenaariumid aastani 2100. Tallinn: Keskkonnaagentuur.

Statistics Estonia 2019. Rahvastikuprognoos aastani 2080.

United Nations 2019a. Revision of World Population Prospects.

References

Ait, J. 2017. Noored IT-seadmete ja interneti maailmas. https://blog.stat.ee/2017/10/26/noored-it-seadmete-ja-interneti-maailmas.

Atkinson, R. D., Muro, M., Whiton, J. 2019. The case for growth centers: how to spread tech innovation across America. Washington: Brookings.

Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., Finnveden, G. 2006. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user’s guide – Futures, 38 (7), 723–739.

Cerrone, D, Grišakov, K., Lehtovuori, P., Männigo, K. 2019. meta PARK. Tallinn: SPIN Unit.

Cilluffo, A., Ruiz, N. G. 2019. World’s population is projected to nearly stop growing by the end of the century. Pew Research Center, Fact-tank – News in the Numbers.

Cushman & Wakefield 2015. European Shopping Centre Development Report.

de Waal, M. 2014. The City as Interface. How New Media Are Changing the City. Rotterdam: nai010 publishers.

Estonian Research Centre – Eesti Uuringukeskus 2018. Tallinnlaste rahuloluküsitlus 2018-3.

ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observation Network 2012. Climate Change and Europe’s Regions. https://www.espon.eu/climate-2012.

European Commission 2018. A Clean Planet for all: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773&from=EN.

European Commission 2019. Climate change consequences. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/change/consequences_en.

Evans, J. 2019. Global cities begin to shrink as inner areas empty out. – Financial Times, 25 August.

Eventbrite 2017. The Experience Movement. How Millennials Are Bridging Cultural and Political Divides Offline.

Gartner Research 2017. For Mobility as a Service to Work, CIOs Must Help Deliver Convenience to Customers or End Users Over Cost Reductions.

Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J. D. 2019. World Happiness Report.

Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluvirasto 2014. Pyöräilyn edistämisohjelma.

IATA 2019. 20 Year Passenger Forecast.

Ibrus, I. 2019. Ostes pileteid eesti eludesse. – ERR Arvamus, 17 October.

Laakso, S., Loikkainen H. A. 2018. Kaupungistuminen – viimeaikainen ilmiö vai pitkään jatkunut kehityskulku? – Kvartti, 11 May.

Land Board 2015. Elamumaa turuülevaade.

McAfee, A., Brynjolfsson, E. 2017. Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

McCrindle, M. 2018. Generation next: meet Gen Z and the Alphas. https://mccrindle.com.au/insights/blog/generation-nextmeet-gen-z-alphas.

Metsoja, A., Nelis, L., Nurk, E. 2018. Euroopa laste rasvumise seire. Eesti 2015/16. õa uuringu raport. Tallinn: Tervise Arengu Instituut.

Ministry of Social Affairs 2017. Eesti tööelu-uuring 2015. 1.

Ministry of Social Affairs 2019. Rahvastiku tervise arengukava 2020–2030. https://www.sm.ee/et/rahvastiku-tervise-arengukava-2020-2030.

Mällo, T. 2019. Pärast kino läheme õhtust sööma. Kes seda tegelikult otsustab? – Eesti Päevaleht, 26 November.

Noorkõiv, R. 2015. Korteriturg regionaalarengu taseme mõõdikuna. – Servinski, M., Kivilaid, M., Tischler, G. (eds.). Eesti piirkondlik areng 2015. Tallinn: Statistikaamet, 170–176, 177–181.

Pärna, O. (ed.) 2016. Töö ja oskused 2025. Tööjõuvajaduse seire- ja prognoosisüsteem OSKA – OSKuste Arendamise koordinatsioonisüsteemi loomine. Ülevaade olulisematest trendidest ja nende mõjust Eesti tööturule kümne aasta vaates. Tallinn: Sihtasutus Kutsekoda.

PwC – PricewaterhouseCoopers 2012. Millennials at Work – Reshaping the Workplace in Financial Services.

PwC – PricewaterhouseCoopers 2018. Five Trends Transforming the Automotive Industry.

Raid, K., Tammur, A. 2018. Millisesse perre sünnivad lapsed? – Eesti Statistika Kvartalikiri, 4, 9–17.

Rapp, N., Heimer, M. 2016. These 4 charts show why shopping malls are in trouble. – Fortune, 2 December.

Reile, R., Tekkel, M., Veideman, T. 2019. Eesti täiskasvanud rahvastiku tervisekäitumise uuring 2018. Tallinn: Tervise Arengu Instituut.

Rogan, K. 2019. The 3 pictures that explain everything about smart cities. https://www.citylab.com/design/2019/06/smart-city-photos-technology-marketing-branding-jibberjabber/592123/?fbclid=IwAR0wxR1RB5n9HicYYEuZfse_rjmm-0s37czDBnM-uMLGdv-qpCEIwvi1bRds.

Rosenthal, S. S., Strange, W. C. 2004. Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. – Henderson, J. V., Thisse, J. F. (eds.). Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Volume 4, Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2119–2171.

Rumpel, R., Slach, O. 2014. Shrinking cities in central Europe. – Tasilo, H., Petr, D., Pavel, R., Koutsky, J. (eds.). Transitions in Regional Science – Regions in Transition: Regional Research in Central Europe. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 142–155.

Sassiad, M. 2019. Liikuvus kui teenus. Tartu Planeerimiskonverentsi 2019 ettekanne.

Schwartz, P. 1991. The Art of the Long View: Paths to Strategic Insight for Yourself and Your Company. New York: Currency Doubleday.

Statistics Estonia 2018a. Jagamismajandusteenuse kasutajate osatähtsus suureneb. Press release 100.

Statistics Estonia 2018b. TT232: Põhitöökoha keskmine kaugus elukohast soo ja töölkäimise viisi järgi. Database.

Thomas, C. W. 1994. Learning from imagining the years ahead. – Planning Review, 22 (3), 6–10.

Thompson, D. 2019. Why are America’s three biggest metros shrinking? https://www.citylab.com/life/2019/09/why-are-americas-three-biggest-metros-shrinking/597682.

TNS Emor 2015. Tallinna elanike liikumisviiside uuring elektrisõidukite lühirendi ja säästva transpordi kasutamise arendamiseks.

United Nations Population Division 2017. Population Facts 2017.

United Nations Population Division 2018. The World’s Cities in 2018. Data Booklet.

United Nations 2019b. Digital Economy Report 2019. Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries.

UN-Habitat 2015. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). Global Public Space Toolkit: From Global Principles to Local Policies and Practice.

Wright, G., Cairns, G., Bradfield, R. 2013. Scenario methodology: new developments in theory and practice. Introduction to the Special Issue. – Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80 (4), 561–565.